spir wrote: > I intend to do some trials with simpledisplay. This could also > provide for a few unittests. Are you interested in that?
Yeah, sounds good. > What is the advantage of laziness here (both for input and output)? > One needs to compute the while pic anyway... Actually simple ranges >(aven simple arrays?) would do the job as well, wouldn't they? The main reason I went this way was to be like the rest of Phobos. Why does Phobos use laziness so much? One big reason is you can always go from lazy to eager, but not the other way around. Just call array() on it. Lazy computations can also save on a lot of memory if you don't need the whole thing at once, especially if it's very large. One situation this might be useful is working with video. Hopefully, the lazy algorithms for images will be reusable for a streaming video too. My StaticGenerator there could do any size without taking more than the memory needed for a single line. Finally, there might be a small speed boost, since it lets you mix CPU and disk operations together - load part of the file, then process it while the next part is still coming off the disk, instead of having the processor sit idle while waiting for it to load. It could also cut down on memory allocations by reusing buffers too. (My implementation doesn't realize this very well, but it could be done in theory. However, a part of me isn't sure it's a great idea... mutable buffers in std.stdio.File wasted some time yesterday because I forgot to copy them... but still, it's possible to do more this way.) > For instance, I'd like a fill(shape,fillColor) function working > for any (closed) shape Yes, indeed.
