Not sure. Is ddbg open and available? Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 13, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Bruno Medeiros <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/04/2011 23:04, Sean Kelly wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Bruno Medeiros wrote: >> >>> On 22/03/2011 23:41, Jonas Drewsen wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> It seems that every now and then a discussion about build tools or D >>>> package management pops up in this group. Many people on this list have >>>> a huge amount of experience and knowledge in this area. Some has even >>>> created their own tools for D. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately this has not yet resulted in a standard set of tools somehow. >> >> To be pragmatic, one thing I think would help is if all such projects were >> hosted somewhere public, like GitHub, and distributed under very open >> licenses (Boost comes to mind). People lose interest, time, etc, and it's a >> shame when a valuable project is either lost entirely or remains available >> but licensed in a way that prevents anyone else from picking up the baton. > > True, but has this problem arisen before in D's build tools? AFAIK, the > popular D build tools (DSSS, bud, rebuild, xfBuild) all had friendly licenses > that anyone could continue working on them. > > -- > Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
