Am 17.05.2011 22:44, schrieb Stewart Gordon: > On 12/05/2011 13:21, Matthew Ong wrote: >> @dennis luehring > <snip> >> I do not think that this is syntactic sugar. Compare this 2 block of >> code. Which >> is easier to read? > <snip> > > Features to improve the readability of code are the very definition of > syntactic sugar. Indeed, Prolog programmers rely on syntactic sugar a lot. > > Could you be thinking of syntactic saccharin? >
Sweet syntax with a disgusting bitter aftertaste? ;) > Stewart.
