Currently, DMD accepts declarations of the form:
enum int foo(){writeln("foo!\n");return 123;}
which seems to be exactly equivalent to
int foo(){writeln("foo!\n");return 123;}
However, enum foo(){writeln("foo!\n");return 123;} is rejected.
Given the fact that enum is also used for declaring manifest constants, this
does seem odd. No semantic implications are added to a function declaration
when extended by the enum storage class.
I see two possibilities:
1. Disallow "enum" functions.
2. Allow, and make the "enum" function compile-time only.
Timon
