On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:56:54 +0100, Robert Clipsham wrote: > On 15/06/2011 15:33, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> On 6/15/11 9:13 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: >>> We have been getting along swimmingly without pragmas for adding local >>> include paths. Why do we need to add them using pragmas for network >>> include paths? >> >> That doesn't mean the situation is beyond improvement. If I had my way >> I'd add pragma(liburl) AND pragma(libpath). > > pragma(lib) doesn't (and can't) work as it is, why do you want to add > more useless pragmas?
In what sense doesn't pragma(lib) work? This is news to me. Graham
