Jonathan M Davis wrote: > I'm afraid that I don't understand this view at all, given that > string is a word and stringz isn't, though there are a few people > that have expressed this view now.
If we had a function for to!ulong in this style, would you call it toULong or toUlong? I'd expect the latter - the word is "ulong", a single unit, not "U Long". D1 also did it this way: http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/phobos/std_conv.html
