On 6/25/2011 8:11 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 6/26/11 4:18 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Perhaps you're right. But breaking his existing, working code will scare
off a lot more people.
[…]
Breaking existing code has been going on for years now. It needs to stop.
So let's just modify the purity semantics without even mentioning the change
before? Or did I just totally miss the discussion on that?
I didn't change the semantics, I implemented them :-(
dmd was totally ignoring purity checks for some constructs.
