On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:58:04 +0300, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
Wouldn't that be quite invasive? I imagine every function that would want to work on ranges would then have to provide two versions, one that does the work and onethat calls the other version after having applied the adaptor(s)? Cheers, -Timon
Right, we probably need to change functions but no we don't need to overload any of them.