"dsimcha" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > 3. All the stuff from the old std.path should be "scheduled for > deprecation". Deprecating stuff breaks people's build processes and > should only be done after adequate warning. I don't know a good way to > implement this for enums and aliases, though, which I guess begs the > question of whether DMD should support soft deprecation. >
Isn't that what -d is for? > 1. Do we really need currentDirSymbol and parentDirSymbol? AFAIK they're > standard across all operating systems that anyone cares about and everyone > can easily remember them. I have never used the equivalents in the old > std.path and have never missed them. > > 4. This module might be useful at compile time. As pointed out on this > forum, Phobos should eventually include tests for CTFE-ability. It would > be nice if std.path had a few CTFE unit tests sprinkled in. > Seconded, on both #1 and #4.
