> So what are you suggesting, that we don't have a package manager for D? I'm suggesting, I'm not likely to use it, and developing a D-specific package manager should not accidentally exclude stand-alone building of packages. As I said before, the build-system and packaging system must be independent, but well integrated.
Quoting again from Russel Winder: >> Having a D language packaging system that was in some way harmonious >> with Apt/Deb, Yum/RPM, Ports, etc. would make a lot of people very happy. >> Indirectly it would make traction a whole lot easier.
