Both toStringz and toUTFz do something potentially unsafe. Both check whether the character after the end of the string is NULL. If so, then it simply returns a pointer to the original string. This is a good optimization in theory because this code:

string s = "abc";

will be a slice to a read-only section of the executable. The compiler will insert a NULL after the string in the read-only section. So this:

auto x = toStringz("abc");

is efficient. No relocations.

As @AndrejMitrovic commented in Phobos pull request 123 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/123, this has potential issues:

import std.string;
import std.stdio;

struct A
{
    immutable char[2] foo;
    char[2] bar;
}

void main()
{
    auto a = A("aa", "\0b");
    auto charptr = toStringz(a.foo[]);

    a.bar = "bo";
    printf(charptr);   // two chars, then garbage
}

Another issue not mentioned is with slices. If I do...

string s = "abc";
string y = s[];
string z = y[];

z ~= '\0';

auto c = toStringz(y);

assert(c.ptr == y.ptr);

... what happens if I change that last character of z before I pass c to the C routine? Bad news. I think this optimization is great, but doesn't it go against D's motto of doing "the right thing by default"?

The question is, how can we keep this optimization so that:

toStringz("abc");

remains efficient?

The capacity field is 0 if the string is in a read-only section *or* if the string is on the stack:

auto x = "abc";
assert(x.capacity == 0);
char[3] y = "abc";
assert(x.capacity == 0);

So, this isn't safe either. This code:

    char[3] x = "abc";
    char y = '\0';

will put y right after x, so changing y after calling toStringz will cause issues.

In reality, the only time it's safe to do the "peek after end" is if the string is in the read-only section. Otherwise, there are potential issues (even if they are edge cases).

Do we care about this? Is there something we can add to druntime arrays that will tell whether or not the data backing a slice is in read-only memory (or perhaps an enum: read-only, stack, heap, other)? In reality, the only time this changes is when a read-only / stack heap is appended to, so performance issues are minimal.

Comments? Ideas?

Reply via email to