On 02.08.2011 22:36, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Iain Buclaw <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:== Quote from KennyTM~ ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>)'s article > On Aug 2, 11 20:00, Jason House wrote: > > The post says they did "dmd -O". They did not mention "-inline -noboundscheck -release". There may be extra flags that are required. > > > > Walter Bright Wrote: > > > >> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/j48tf/how_is_c_better_than_d/c29do98 > >> > >> Anyone care to examine the assembler output and figure out why? > > > Let dmd have an '-O9999' flag to as a synonym of '-O -inline > -noboundscheck -release' so people won't miss the extra flags in > benchmarks. [/joke] -O9001 will make the Redditors happy. -Ofast sounds better. ;)
How about replacing -w with -9001? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9001#Contents_of_ISO_9001
