dsimcha: > 1. Is anyone besides me interested in this?
Other people are interested. > 3. Would this be Phobos material even though it would depend on MPI, or > would it better be kept as a 3rd party library? I'd like one or more Phobos modules built on top of the basic MPI, so I think it's better to have MPI too in Phobos. > Should the restriction be kept (for consistency) or > removed (because it doesn't serve much of a purpose in the MPI context)? This not easy to say now, for me. Bye, bearophile
