Jonathan M Davis: > There's no reason to have a separate version of the language which is more > compatible with C than another version. It would just complicate things. Not > only would it be a burden on the compiler maintainers, but then you would > have > to know whether code was intended to be compiled with the standard D compiler > or with the one which is more compatible with C. It would be a mess for very > little benefit.
You are too much quick at dismissing this. There are several advantages you aren't even listing. Bye, bearophile
