On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:22:46 -0400, dsimcha wrote: > The review of the new std.path is drawing to a close and it looks like > another success! (Congratulations, Lars.) Lately, though, the queue of > stuff to review has been getting rather long, admittedly a problem we'd > like to have. I want to get a list of stuff that's ready or will be > ready in short order, so we can prioritize.
I've got a CSV parser which is close. I just want to get an unofficial review of the documentation, but I've thought of one thing that I should document better.
