On Saturday, August 13, 2011 23:02 Jonathan M Davis wrote: [snip] > So, the question is: Is drop worth having in Phobos? It's common in > functional languages, and if you want to program in a more functional > style, it's of enormous benefit. We'll still have popFrontN regardless, so > the question is whether drop adds enough value to be worth having or > whether it's just too similar to popFrontN to be worth adding to the > standard library. > > Personally, I think that drop would be a _very_ useful function to have. > What do you think?
Does anyone else have an opinion on this? It will be a lot easier to talk Andrei into having drop in Phobos if more than just 2 people respond. - Jonathan M Davis
