I meant atomic types, though I could probably be convinced otherwise. Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 30, 2011, at 5:25 PM, dsimcha <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/30/2011 8:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote: > >> I'd like to say that the 'shared' attribute on member functions should just >> mean "make this member visible through a shared reference" and do away with >> the memory barriers idea entirely, except that D really does need some form >> of atomics. I'm really not sure what the solution is here. > > What's wrong with core.atomic?
