On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:00:46 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2011-09-01 18:28, jdrewsen wrote: >> Den 01-09-2011 06:43, David Nadlinger skrev: [snip] >> >>> Jonas, do you already have a revised version ready that could >>> immediately be voted upon? I recognize that quite a large number of >>> suggestions was raised, but as there are quite a few other components >>> currently waiting in the review queue, we want to make sure not to >>> introduce any avoidable delays while working through that list. >> >> I have done a lot of the changes but there are still quite some work >> left to do. Please go on with another review and I'll get back when I'm >> ready for a next round. >> >>> If not, I would propose to postpone the voting phase and start the >>> review for another component, e.g. David Simcha's std.regionallocator, >>> now. After Jonas had enough time to finish a version he considers fit >>> for inclusion into Phobos, I would suggest a short (one week) combined >>> review/vote period to decide on inclusion with the standard library. >> >> Sounds good to me. >> >> Thanks for running this review. >> >> /Jonas > > BTW, shouldn't etc.curl be std.net.curl now when we have a std.net > package.
In general splitting Phobos into subpackages would be great idea. Now everything goes to root, if somebody implements more digest mechanisms we will have in root, std.md5, std.sha256, std.sha1, std.whirpool etc etc, std.digest.X looks way much better. Same goes with std.datetime, it really could be splitted into std.date.time, std.date.UTC etc etc :-D Sorry for off-topic :-p
