On 09/05/2011 07:31 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:05:23 +0200, bearophile
<[email protected]> wrote:
Robert Jacques:
> Seconded. StaticIota is extremely useful for loop unrolling
optimizations, e.g.:
vote++
vote--
StaticIota is not the good solution. I have explained why elsewhere:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4085
Certainly we could sit in a corner and pray to almighty Walter that this be
implemented, when he's done with the things he wants to do with D. Oooor
- we
could add StaticIota to Phobos, bypass the problem, and live happily
ever after.
Yes, static foreach would be nice, but the means to do what it would do,
are
easily implemented in the language as is.
That is some heavy C++ design style reasoning.
