Walter: > The point of that working is that it isn't unusual to have a large array with > only the front of it initialized.
I have not proposed to forbid that (despite I think Pull 375 forbids it) (despite I think I have never had this need), but just to make this explicit syntax-wise, instead of implicit, not much visible, and bug-prone. Explicit is often better than implicit. ------------------------ Andrej Mitrovic: > int[3] arr2 = [1, 2]; // fails at runtime With the latest Pull this will fail at compile-time (well, both of them). Bye, bearophile
