On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 03:46 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote: [ . . . ] > Ok, granted, that sounds rather tongue-in-cheek, but I'm fairily serious > about it: Is there some reason you need to actually put it all through > autotools? I'm no expert, but autotools strikes me as just a collection of > workarounds to paper over some of the crappiness of C/C++ and make. Why > apply it to D?
Autotools is a very good piece of m4 hacking but it is a sticking plaster over Make — which was a revolution and revelation in 1978, but is now not start of the art. I guess if you want to stay with Make then CMake is the way forward. Otherwise SCons or Waf. Or Drake? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
