On 21/09/11 6:15 PM, Mehrdad wrote:
I can't find the thread, but I remember someone (bearophile?) mentioned
that the reason we have transitive const is to support purity.

I don't think I understand why this is necessary, though -- could
someone please explain why we have transitive const, and what problems
it fixes?

Thanks!

It's mostly for concurrent programming.

If I pass an immutable(T) reference type to another thread then I need to be guaranteed that the object is entirely immutable.

If it weren't for transitive const/immutable, this would be possible:

class Foo
{
    Foo m_ref;
    this() { m_ref = this; }
    Foo get() immutable { return m_ref; }
}

immutable(Foo) foo = new Foo();
Foo surprise = foo.get(); // un-immutable-ified!

Reply via email to