On 9/26/11, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that we need to be _very_ careful about the implications of making > isIntegral and other similar traits functions work with non-primitive types. > There could _easily_ be code which assumes that it's going to get primitive > types when isIntegral is true.
Not *there easily could be* but *there is*. At least in my code..
