"Steven Schveighoffer" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:11:29 -0400, Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Of course, as it is now, the slice owner won't even know if >> the values it points to have been pooped off and *not* been pushed back >> on >> again. > > Freudian slip or simple typo? Either way, *hilarious* :)
lmao. And it's surprisingly appropriate for the context. > Gives a new mental picture for a stack... Yea, and properly "upside-down" just like our trees. Although I'm not I like the implications that has for "push"...I guess that means the analogy would be better suited for a FIFO.
