Jonathan M Davis , dans le message (digitalmars.D:145653), a écrit : > Having toUTF and toUTFz is a marked improvement in many cases - especially > for > generic code. They're being added regardless of what the deal with toUTF16z > is. > > The reason that toUTF16z is being removed is essentially because Andrei is > very much opposed to having functions with specific types in their names and > thinks that they should all be generic. Personally, I'm not opposed to > keeping > toUTF16z as an alias or wrapper to toUTFz. It's Andrei that seems to feel > stongly about it. So, if enough people really want to keep toUTF16z, then I > think that that can happen.
Sure, toWcharz would be a really bad name, but UTF16 is not a specific type, it is a specific encoding. -- Christophe
