On 2/10/11 12:44 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:32:56 -0400, mta`chrono <[email protected]> wrote:int[2] a; immutable(int)[2] b = a.idup;That should not be necessary. There's no reason to allocate a heap array in order to copy data that implicitly casts to immutable. Definitely a bug. -Steve
Yep. Looks like dsimcha beat me to the bug report: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4454 Up-voted!
