"Trass3r" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:op.v2zhq60v3ncmek@enigma... >> I see. You mean using curses if available and falling back to ISO/IEC >> 6429. So you think that supporting ISO/IEC 6429 terminals is too >> limited, aren't you? > > Well I personally only care about bash and Windoze console. I guess these > support ISO 6429?!
Windows console windows don't, oddly enough. Even though MS-DOS did if you had ANSI.SYS loaded. And, maybe I'm wrong, but I would think that shell interpreter wouldn't have anything to do with whether or not ANSI escape codes are avilable. Isn't that more a matter of terminal program (ie, xterm, vs...umm, all those others...)
