yeah, currently i do the same :-)
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Fawzi Mohamed <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: > >> Do anybody know a good way to (statically) debug a generated code? >> Currently it takes lots of effort to determine the place, where the >> code is being incorrectly generated. > my method is to try to have a single mixing rather than several (i.e. making > nested mixing simple concatenate the corresponding code). > So I can pragma(msg,myMixinFunction()); and possibly even replace the mixing > with the generated code when debugging it. > > this supposing you were referring to mixing problems, templates normally > behave better, but I tend to pass explicit template parameters to improve > their behavior in case of errors > > Fawzi >
