On 21/10/11 11:03 PM, so wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:38:39 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
<jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote:
In another post in this thread, Walter said in reference to post on
essentially this idea: "Making such a string type would be terribly
inefficient. It would make D completely uncompetitive for processing
strings."
Now, whether that's true is debatable, but that's his stance on the idea.
- Jonathan M Davis
Well he is right, the reason built-in strings everywhere and rarely (so
rare that i have never seen one yet) someone comes up with a better
alternative.
IMO people are spoiled by dynamic languages and fail to see the
strengths of D strings. Someone coming from C/C++ this is heaven, both
for performance and flexibility.
Which operations do you believe would be less efficient?
