Re: Another Shared Bug?

[Dmitry Olshansky]

On 25.10.2011 2:34, Andrew Wiley wrote:
My understanding is that this:
--------
module test2;
synchronized abstract class Bob {
private:
int _i = 2;
public:
@property
int i() {
return _i;
}
}

synchronized class Bill : Bob {
public:
@property
int thing() {
return i;
}
}
--------
should be the same as this:
--------
module test2;

synchronized abstract class Bob {
private:
int _i = 2;
public:
@property
int i() {
return _i;
}
}

synchronized class Bill : Bob {
public:
@property
int thing() {
return super.i(); //test2.d(18): Error: function test2.Bob.i () shared
is not callable using argument types ()

Mm maybe it complains about i being property and not a function? Though 
that was forced yet(?). Does plain super.i without () work here? 
Sometimes error messages are plain wrong. In ether case it seems like a bug.

}
}
--------
But the second one gets a compiler error. Bug?


--
Dmitry Olshansky