On 03-11-2011 15:06, Kagamin wrote:
Do I understand it right, that "sacred history problem" is a problem only for
git due to how it implements merges?
Also if you can always fast forward the main branch, does it mean the project
is small, i.e. ~1 man is working on it?
No, Git is probably the DVCS with *least* sacred history (read: nothing
is sacred).
I meant, sacred history would be a problem only in git and is not a problem for
other DVCSes where merges are done properly.
It's not just related to merges. With sacred history, you lose the
ability to rebase, too.
- Alex
