On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:47:48 +0100, Marco Leise wrote: > Am 03.11.2011, 18:43 Uhr, schrieb Steve Teale > <[email protected]>: > >> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:22:49 -0400, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, November 03, 2011 09:22 Steve Teale wrote: >>>> I see that Walter just fixed a typedef bug in 2.056, even though I >>>> was just ticked of for even thinking of using one ;=) >>> >>> He probably fixed it because it hasn't actually been given the axe >>> yet, but it's definitely going to get the axe - and probably soon, >>> since there was some discussion of wanting to remove (or at least >>> deprecate) features that are definitely going to be removed before gdc >>> actually makes it into gcc so that the changes are less disruptive >>> when they happen. >>> >> Jonathan, >> >> I thank you for your reply. I was just watching Sarkozy at the G20 >> talking about the potential Greek referendum. He took a similarly firm > It caused some discussion. Someone didn't like the naked-function > feature or other traits of D that (official) support has to be written > for in the GCC backend first. But I don't see how D would become > unbearable for the GCC people as long as the frontend is maintained. > There have been other language frontends bitrotting before, so the > 'Eurozone' is suspicious and looks closely on who is joining them. Since > D in GCC is often requested I believe it will have a positive future > there and give the language more momentum, since people don't have to > leave their known and pre-installed tool chain.
I was thinking of us as Greece and them as Eurozone - what effects on DMD?
