Am 08.11.2011, 20:28 Uhr, schrieb Tobias Pankrath <tob...@pankrath.net>:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It's bad practice on both counts. Creating an unnecessary alias
(especially for a built-in type) just serves to obfuscate code and
confuse
other programmers. Regardless of the name chosen, it shouldn't be done.
And as cool as it may be to be able to use unicode in a .d file, unicode
characters are not typeable on most keyboards, so using unicode
characters
for anything outside of strings is generally a bad idea.
Exactly what I mean. My point was, that unicode names wouldn't be bad
practice if everyone could easily write them, which is not the case :-(
I fully agree on the "no alias of build-ins" thing.
Nah, DDOC can help with the obfuscation:
http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/5646/hinton.png
I would not use this in anything that is supposed to end up as a library
for anyone to use.
Maybe in an "open-source" project where I don't actually want others to
mess with my code, but use GitHub's free services. ;)
