Separating compiler built-in and user-space solutions is a bad idea, IMO. The evolution of programming languages clearly show, that there is less and less magic in the air as they develop. Ultimately, programming languages will be reduced to a tiny tiny core and a giant ball of user-space support layers.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Timon Gehr <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/10/2011 08:36 PM, Xinok wrote: >> >> On 11/10/2011 2:08 PM, Tobias Pankrath wrote: >>> >>> I'm currently writing some template based code and there are >>> situations, when I want to issue warnings or errors to users of my code. >>> >>> I know of pragma(msg), but the output will be formatted differently >>> from the >>> normal compiler warnings / errors. This is bad for tool integration >>> and the >>> messages will likely not catch the eye of a normal user. >>> >>> Therefore I propose to add two pragmas pragma(error) and >>> pragma(warning) to >>> the core language, which work just like pragma(msg), but will format the >>> message the way, the compiler would format >>> its own error messages or warnings. >>> >>> pragma(error) should cause a real compile error, too. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> I'm not against this idea, but I'd prefer that actual compiler warnings >> & errors would be distinguishable from those thrown by code. > > They are because the compiler gives line information (and a good error > message will normally be as specific as to give a good indication that it > was thrown by code anyway). >
