On 11-11-2011 19:31, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/11/2011 5:43 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 11-11-2011 14:35, dsimcha wrote:
On 11/11/2011 3:57 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 11-11-2011 08:22, Jude Young wrote:
On Fri 11 Nov 2011 01:13:32 AM CST, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Is the LDC project dead? the last update I found is from 2010.
Thanks to Trass3r via stackoverflow.
https://bitbucket.org/lindquist/ldc/changesets
Looks like there are some commits a few months back.
It might have died in the meantime though
It is on GitHub: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc
- Alex
This needs to be publicized somewhere. This whole time I thought LDC was
dead because I was looking on Thomas Lindquist's BitBucket repo, which
hasn't been updated since July.
Come to think of it, I don't think it was announced anywhere but on
IRC. There
was, however, an NG post a while back, asking whether LDC could be
hosted under
the DPL organization on GitHub (it didn't get much of any attention...).
I hadn't noticed that request.
I don't know if it is a good idea or not to put it under
d-programming-language. One issue is it might run out of space for the
free version :-) Another might be the implication of who is in charge of
it.
I was in contact with GitHub some months back, and the space limit is
actually a soft limit - for open source projects, they don't actually
care if we exceed the limit (as long as we aren't doing anything
obviously evil of course :)).
I think you could use the teams system in organizations to deal with
admin access to the repos.
Anyhow, may I make a suggestion? I tried to make a deimos project under
github, but that was taken. So instead, I thought of
d-programming-deimos, which seems perfect. Can I suggest renaming
ldc-developers to d-programming-ldc? I think that would help tie the D
related projects together.
Right now, someone looking at "ldc-developers" would have no idea it is
related to D.
Prefixing D projects with "d-programming" would help out with brand
visibility.
Makes sense.
- Alex
