On 2011-11-15 09:25, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/14/2011 11:50 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What would be necessary for you to call a language multiparadigm?
If using multiple paradigms is reasonably natural and convenient in that
language.
For example:
C: imperative
C++: imperative, OOP, metaprogramming
Java: OOP
D: imperative, OOP, metaprogramming, functional, assembler, script
I've seen metaprogramming in C using the preprocessor. But it ain't
natural or convenient. It's hideous.
If you would consider at least two paradigms as multiparadigm then I
would say that a lot of languages are multiparadigm.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
