At any rate, I wouldn't want the D intro page to mention any other language.
Andrei
On 11/17/11 8:05 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Hi,
the only issue with your sentence is that the "efficiency of native code" is
also
possible with C#.
--
Paulo
"Daniel Gibson"<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Am 16.11.2011 02:24, schrieb Jude Young:
I see one camp that is against using multi-paradigm on the basis that
it sounds buzz-wordy, and another camp for using because it does
actually mean something specific.
I'm not against calling D "multi paradigm", I'm just against the style of
the "Modern convenience. Multi-paradigm power. Native efficiency."
sentences. It *sounds* buzzwordy, regardless of the words.
Even "Rusty bars. Heavy chains. Merciless guards." sounds like a cheap
commercial ;)
OTOH "D is a modern, powerful multi-paradigm programming language that
combines the efficiency of native code with the convenience of modern
languages like C#" contains all those buzzwords but doesn't sound as bad.
Cheers,
- Daniel
