On 20.11.2011 21:07, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/20/11 10:41 AM, Norbert Nemec wrote:
[snip]
Why not follow the patter of isXxx in the standard library?
Andrei
Actually, that was my starting point. However, this approach does not
scale up:
A concept typically is a collection of requirements that have to be met
individually. A huge boolean statement inside an assertion does not give
any clue as to which part of it failed.
The isXxx approach works fine for the template constraint itself, but to
assert that a given type meets all requirements of a concept, it is not
very usable at all.
