On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:55:23 +0100 Anders F Björklund <a...@algonet.se> wrote:
> http://xkcd.com/224/ LOL. > Sounds like a good idea, though you probably want to use SWIG 2.0 > for the improved D support - while wxPython uses SWIG 1.3 afaict ? I do not know about wxPython, but, yes, SWIG 2.0 which has support for D. > I would drop support for wxWidgets 2.x and DMD 1.x - and go for > wxWidgets 2.9.x and DMD 2.0xx directly. I fully agree, > And pick one "make" (GNU). That's not fully clear to me. > Trying to support two languages, two libraries, two+ compilers, > two+ buildtools, and so on, was just no fun and not very workable ? Can you explain what do you think? > It's easier to just use configure+make, and MSYS/MinGW on Windows, > than trying to work with the DOS console (in C++) or DM's Make.exe. I'm also thinking about cmake and will try to help Jens to prepare cmaked2 to be included in the upstream. Cmake is not the most elegant tool, but it works and I got confirmation that it supports dmd & gdc. What do you think? Sincerely, Gour -- As a strong wind sweeps away a boat on the water, even one of the roaming senses on which the mind focuses can carry away a man's intelligence. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
