Walter Bright <[email protected]> writes: > On 11/22/2011 7:19 AM, Martin Nowak wrote: >> - Can we slowly start to acquire DWARF-3/4? > > Dwarf 2 is good enough, so why do 3/4? > >> - Why were extensions chosen over say representing an array as two field >> struct? > > Because it is presumably harder to get a debugger to recognize a magic > struct than explicitly give it a type. > >> - There is this request by Robert Clipsham >> http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=100504.1. >> What's the state of this, it wouldn't be needed any longer. >> >> - We should contact http://www.zero-bugs.com, it is said to support the >> dwarf extensions and would need to be changed. >> >> - Find out who else is affected by changing the current extensions. >> >> - Fixing the D-ABI specification. > > Are the issues in bugzilla?
Huh, I swore I had already filed a bug regarding the AA ABI. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7008 Jerry
