On 2011-11-29 09:16, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 29.11.2011, 08:47 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com>:
Note that I have no experience with wx but the screenshots on the site
looks really bad.
Take a look at Code::Blocks for an example. I think it is one of the
most sophisticated applications written with wxWidgets. I used to have
trouble with the XML GUI definitions though. Somehow they took ages for
me to load and generate the UI on Linux, but not on Windows. So I am
biased slightly against wx with XML or XRC or what they are called.
I'll have a look at Code::Blocks.
The images to the right http://eclipse.org/swt/ remind me of some
discussion we had here. Anyway I'm fine with SWT, too and used gtkD
previously. I think it looks good and is small by itself, relying mostly
on functionality from the Java library where C++ libraries like QT tend
to build up a large general purpose code base.
I know these images are not the best but at least they look better than
wxWidget's.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
