Paulo Pinto Wrote: > Kagamin Wrote: > > > bearophile Wrote: > > > > > And this is positive because? > > > > You say it as if it's negative. > > > For me it is negative as what I understood from this discussion is that > contrary to what is described in TDPL, D modules are not ready to prime time. > > At least at the level Modula-2(3), Ada, Delphi, .Net, among others, offer > modules.
And what .net modules provide you that D modules don't? Putting aside that I don't remember anything like D modules in .net. .Net has namespaces, which I prefer more, yes.
