"Jacob Carlborg" <d...@me.com> wrote in message news:jbj0lo$mec$1...@digitalmars.com... > On 2011-12-05 18:05, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "Somedude"<lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com> wrote in message >> news:jbhquu$1mj2$1...@digitalmars.com... >>> Le 04/12/2011 21:24, Jacob Carlborg a écrit : >>>> >>>> But the problem remains, CoffeeScript compiles to JavaScript so you are >>>> still limited by JS. >>>> >>> What about Lua ? >>> I find it pretty powerful for such a small language. And I do think it >>> makes sens to base a GUI on a scripting language. >> >> I'm with John Carmack on this one (not that I always agree with him): >> Using >> scripting for parts of your program just encourages the team to have >> non-programmers writing production code, and that's never a good thing >> (hell, there's a lot of *actual* programmers who don't even know what >> they're doing). And if the only people writing code are real programmers, >> they may as well just use a real langauge. >> >>> As for the choice of >>> Javascript with Qt, the choice is obvious: the goal is to be able to >>> write once and run anywhere (i.e on desktop, on mobile devices AND on >>> the web). >> >> That's a poor reason to aid in the proliferation of such a terrible >> language. It's also a poor reason to write one's own software in such a >> bad >> langauge. What's needed is for JS on the web to be replaced with a real >> langauge, or at least a sensible one (or better yet, for this "web as an >> applications platform" idiocy to finally end, but that's a separate >> matter). > > Do you have any opinion about Dart from Google? >
No, since this is the first I've heard about it ;) I'll take a look.
