On 5 December 2011 15:33, Don <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05.12.2011 06:27, Walter Bright wrote: > >> On 12/3/2011 6:53 PM, Don wrote: >> >>> It's the things like: >>> is (foo bar == super) >>> which I think you can't understand without looking up the spec every >>> time. We >>> still don't have a nice way of expressing such things. >>> >> >> I agree, but that's a low priority for now, because at least you can get >> work done with it. >> > > Right. But it's hard to come up with high-priority language issues these > days. The old ones have been fixed. <g>. >
I've got one... there's no 128bit hardware vector type! ;) .. That's pretty high for me :P Even if it doesn't do anything, just allocates and addresses the hardware regs and schedules loads/stores... Can write maths in asm, but need a type to pass to/from functions and store in structs/classes...
