> >And I've also been a bit disappointed in the d way of doing things (it's > >easy to write good code but hard is always possible). >
>Could you rephrase that? I don't understand. That sentence was referring to the following paragraph. It's a great slogan but when I actually try to mess around with it it turns out that it's impossible. Note that this is absolutely not true for most cases. I've played a bit with memory editing from D, some dll injection and with the inline assembler.It worked great. I just wish D had a bit more documentation on some more low-level parts like raw sockets for example. Or some tutorials/howto's about the less obvious stuff. The howto's on d-p-l.org are,while beeing very helpful, also very sparse. Could also someone shed some light on creating shared library's on linux? there was some news about -fPIC beeing fixed but no real confirmation.
