On Saturday, December 10, 2011 16:00:15 Walter Bright wrote: > On 12/10/2011 3:45 PM, Manu wrote: > > Cool cheers, noted, although to be completely honest, I'm a windows > > user, and I will never type this. There should be a .chm in the > > distribution, which is the standard expected by any windows developer > > from any sdk they intend to take seriously. This is very easy to > > produce from the existing webpage, although indexing it might take some > > investment. > > I didn't think anyone preferred chm over web pages anymore!
I've never even _heard_ of chm, but then again, I'm mostly a Linux programmer. - Jonathan M Davis
