Le 12/12/2011 01:53, dsimcha a écrit : > Actually, that leads to another question: Should this module really be > named etc.curl/std.curl/std.net.curl, or should the fact that it > currently uses Curl as a backend be relegated to an implementation detail? >
I think it's good to remind that this is a wrapper and not a native D implementation. At least if I was a user, I would like to know upfront. So I would keep curl in the name.