On 12 December 2011 18:21, Bane <branimir.milosavlje...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, but it's true. > Compared to C++, it has much friendlier syntax, important built in types and > all the goodies. And let us not forget - big standard library ready to go. > > But it is still rough on the edges, needs polishing and fixing little bugs. > Now it needs tender care to grow big (and lose some weight from executables > :).
Bigger == Better. :o) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
