On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 06:40:40 Michel Fortin wrote: > On 2011-12-13 04:25:33 +0000, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> said: > > For arrays, all you need to do is have the first argument be an array, > > and that works great for arrays, but arrays don't have much in the way > > of functions built in, so there's no conflict. > > Actually, there's still an open issue with array-member syntax and > @property used together.
How so? If it's a property function, not a member function (which couldn't use array-member syntaxt anyway), and it takes an array as its first argument, then it _must_ be called with array-member syntax without parens. If it isn't a property, then you could call it with or without array-member syntax, but you have to use parens. I don't see any conflict there. Now, I don't know what -property is doing with it at the moment, but I don't see how it could work any other way. - Jonathan M Davis
