On 2011-12-13 21:47, torhu wrote:
On 13.12.2011 08:35, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/12/2011 10:26 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:57:02 +0000, Jesse Phillips wrote:
I haven't used D1 for a long time so I can't claim a bad choice here.
Actually I think I can state an opinion here. The two things that stand
out in my mind are.
* There has been a statement of supporting D1 while it is in use (or at
least has a decent number of users). Maybe there aren't any, I don't see
replies claiming such.
There don't seem to be many anymore.
I've got one D1 spare time project that I'm still maintaining. Zero D2
projects, as I tried it and then decided to wait until it has had more
time to mature.
I'm still using DMD 1.061, since there are very few remaining serious
compiler bugs. The compiler has gotten pretty good, so the incentive to
upgrade is not very strong. And I rarely need to ask questions about D1,
since I've been using it for 5 years now.
It's the same for me. But when I do ask questions everyone is surprised
that I use D1.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
